As a "standalone" degree, it's quite valuable. (After all, the most valuable things are important in their own right and for absolutely nothing else, right? Okay, not always the most consoling thought, thanks Aristotle.) However, the point stays that, if you prosper - or did be successful - as a philosophy major, then you're trained to delve deeply into matters your peers typically can not fathom. Naturally, if you are or were wise enough to pair it with another degree, then you will stand apart leagues ahead of most of your peers - assuming you can avoid ending up being the smug and pompous type of philosophy significant common in some bigger institutions (and typically avoid nihilism, to0).
I do not understand if Voldemort would've squandered his time on checking out a book by a muggle, but he would've delighted in the writings of Neitzche -especially The Genealogy of Morals and the aptly entitled Beyond Great and Evil. In both of these works, Neitzche worked out a concept of morality. The majority of ancient viewpoint and faith focused on a transcendent and unbiased "great" that lies beyond humankind. We might call this the types of Plato, the political telos of Aristotle, or "God" in Christianity or any other religion. Neitzche did not concur that any of these acted philosophy as foundation of a "great." God, after all, is dead and we have killed him.
Listen to the personal success masters, the individuals that sell millions of books and host workshops for thousands of individuals, and you'll find very comparable lists of qualities that all successful individuals obviously share.
I will motivate my team to excel and be effective through my example as a leader. I promise to be readily available to them and to support them to the best of my capabilities.
About the same time, our company came out with a statement about the business beliefs. What our business represented and how we would deal with each other and our customers.The understanding of my and the companies viewpoints allows workers to fill out the cracks between the knowledge of our procedures and our systems; hence, to make more reliable choices. Our department is more reliable since of our typical beliefs.
It is approach that genuinely empowers an employee to make reliable choices. I think successful first line managers must explain these philosophies. How they will interact with employees. Why the company exists, why their department exists; and, how these philosophies associate with the company's overall client complete satisfaction.